Route & deadlines
We confirm AR eligibility for your decision type and lock the exact filing deadline.
- Decision & route check
- Correct AR channel/form
- Deadline diarised
Where there’s no right of appeal, we target case-worker errors with a structured AR and supporting citations, file within strict deadlines, and advise clear next steps if AR is unsuccessful.
Rapid audit, precise error mapping, and clean submissions — on time and on point.
We confirm AR eligibility for your decision type and lock the exact filing deadline.
Line-by-line error table with rule citations and pinpoint references to the record.
Structured AR representations with annexed matrix, authorities, and concise ask.
If AR fails, we advise promptly on the strongest alternative: re-apply, appeal (if available), or JR.
AR focuses on case-working errors shown on the record; we prove the error and why it matters.
Caseworker applied the wrong rule or ignored mandatory policy.
Key documents were overlooked or incorrectly interpreted.
Procedural unfairness or defects within decision-making.
We show how the error could have changed the outcome.
Fast audit, precise drafting, and on-time filing — with deadlines protected at each step.
We read the refusal, application record, and guidance to map arguable errors.
Confirm exact timeframe and correct AR route/form; diarise key dates.
Draft a table with rule cites, record pinpoints, and outcome impact.
Submit concise AR with annexed matrix and authorities.
We review the AR outcome and advise on the practical next step.
JR feasibility, re-apply with improvements, or switch route where stronger.
AR is based on the existing record; we cite what was misread and add permitted material only.
Note: New evidence is limited at AR. We focus on errors on the record and only include additions where rules allow.
Transparent scope and realistic timescales — we prioritise your filing deadline.
We confirm exact timelines for your decision type and manage all filings on time.
Scope in writing — no hidden extras. Staged payments available on request.
We correct rule misapplication and record mistakes with precise citations and a clear remedy ask.
Refusal applied an inapplicable rule or policy section.
Decision says evidence was missing when it was uploaded.
Points/criteria miscounted or wrongly assessed.
Conclusions not supported by the record submitted.
Incorrect notice, process, or misapplied guidance.
We show the error could have changed the outcome.
Quick answers on eligibility, evidence, timelines, and next steps.
AR is an internal review that corrects case-working errors on the existing record when no appeal is available.
AR generally focuses on the record already submitted. Limited additions may be allowed — we’ll advise what’s admissible.
Timelines vary by route and caseload. We’ll confirm current expectations for your decision type and track progress.
We advise on the best alternative: re-apply with corrections, appeal (if it becomes available), or Judicial Review.
We’ll map the errors, cite the rules and record precisely, and submit clean representations on time — then guide the next steps.