If you’ve been refused, you still may have options. We audit the decision, identify legal/procedural errors, and act within strict deadlines. Sub-pages: First-tier Tribunal Appeal · Upper Tribunal Appeals · Administrative Review.
We’ll confirm the strongest route for your facts and move quickly within the applicable time limits.
We prepare your appeal bundle, witness evidence, country material and submissions, and represent you at hearing.
Error-of-law focus. We draft Permission to Appeal grounds, renew if refused, and run UT case management/hearings.
Where there’s no right of appeal (certain routes), we challenge case-working errors via AR within tight time limits.
We isolate arguable errors of law and material impact — and confirm when another route (e.g., Administrative Review or Fresh Claim) is stronger.
Tribunal applied the wrong legal test or failed to apply the right one to your facts.
You weren’t able to properly present your case, or the decision lacks adequate reasons.
Findings that cannot be supported by the evidence or are internally inconsistent.
Where appeal isn’t available/viable, we pivot to AR, JR or a Fresh Claim where appropriate.
Fast, focused action within strict time limits — from audit to filing and advocacy.
We review the determination, reasons, evidence and hearing record to spot arguable errors or public law flaws.
We set a route plan (FTT appeal, UT, AR, JR or Fresh Claim) and lock key dates so nothing is missed.
We draft precise grounds, prepare a skeleton argument, and compile targeted evidence or authorities.
We file on time and, where needed, seek stays/injunctions to protect your position.
We advocate at hearings and map next steps post-decision (remittal, re-make, JR or Fresh Claim).
We use your existing record and fill gaps with focused evidence that supports your chosen route.
Note: If standard items are unavailable (e.g., missing transcripts), we’ll explain why and use acceptable alternatives so your case remains decision-ready.
We confirm exact costs and realistic timescales for your route. Where available, we’ll advise on funding options.
Deadlines are strict. We’ll prioritise filing dates and discuss any urgency (e.g., removal directions).
Clear scope and deliverables (grounds, skeleton, evidence schedule, advocacy). No hidden extras.
We identify risks early and structure arguments that match the correct route and remedy.
Decision doesn’t explain findings or ignores key evidence.
Misdirection, wrong standard, or failure to apply guidance.
Surprise points, disclosure issues, or inability to present your case.
Explaining delay and seeking extensions where rules allow.
Administrative Review, JR or Fresh Claim assessment.
Urgent stays/injunctions and liaison with the court/HO.
Quick answers on options, evidence and timings.
FTT hears the facts/law of your appeal. UT focuses on errors of law in the FTT decision (via Permission to Appeal). We’ll advise which stage you’re at and the best step now.
AR applies on certain routes where there is no right of appeal. It challenges case-working errors. We’ll confirm eligibility and deadlines for your decision type.
We triage urgently, lock the correct deadline, and file targeted grounds on time. Where appropriate, we can seek interim relief to prevent removal while the case is considered.
Possibly, depending on circumstances. We’ll advise on urgent applications for a stay/injunction and what evidence is needed to support it.
We’ll audit your decision, confirm the strongest route (FTT, UT, AR, JR or Fresh Claim), lock deadlines, and file a concise, decision-ready submission.
